There's a poll some of you may find interesting:
Should micros have their own type?
The poll is on the GC.com forums.
sd
Printable View
There's a poll some of you may find interesting:
Should micros have their own type?
The poll is on the GC.com forums.
sd
Thanks for the heads up. I voted not to add another cache TYPE, although I'd love to see a new cache SIZE between micro and regular...
did anyone see the new size meter on GC.com I think it is the best thing I've seen It tells the size of the cache on the list page.
I like the idea, but I wish they had filled in all the spaces to the left of the dot, too. For example, on a regular-sized container, fill in the first and second dots, as well. It would make it easier to see the size at a glance...Quote:
Originally Posted by arkansas_stickerdude
That's not a bad idea G. What about those "other" types that are on the far right? Like virtual and other? Should the first 4 be left blank and just that box filled in?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaddiel
You really should post the suggestion in the thread about the icons:
http://forums.groundspeak.com/GC/ind...howtopic=79854
I've found that they're always open to suggestions and quite often they'll actually use the good ones. (Including the size on the cache page was a suggestion)
sd
I took your advice and posted the suggestion. Thanks for reminding me!Quote:
Originally Posted by southdeltan